Las controversias del incremento patrimonial no justificado en el Ecuador

Abstract

The research work narrated verbatim below has the fundamental purpose of analyzing and clarifying the different types of discussions that are generated when talking about the legitimacy and regulation of the unjustified increase in assets. The research methodology is qualitative since the drawback is of a social nature and it is about understanding a complex process of analysis. The main problem of the unjustified patrimonial increase lies in the impossibility of being taxed, this because the enrichment in the aforementioned way is not legal. Therefore, it can be stated that: The person who committed the crime is a criminal. But collaterally, a criminal does not own the object that produces the violation of the law. One of the reasons for discussions is because certain experts in the field establish that the people who commit this type of crime are good payers of the taxes to be established, mainly saying that they do it so as not to raise suspicions, but, on the contrary, there are people dedicated to this type of wrongdoing who skip all this regulation. Another way of looking at the problem is that the taxpayer cannot justify the cause that generated the increase in their assets. ¿So can this problem affect the economy of an entire country?