Right to motherhood in surrogacy processes and the lack in the ecuadorian legal system

Authors

  • Tania Elena Chamorro Paltin Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga, Ecuador
  • José Luis Vásconez Fuentes Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, Latacunga, Ecuador.

Keywords :

Human rights, reproductive rights, reproductive exploitation, legal regulation, surrogacy, legal gaps.

Downloads

Abstract

In Ecuador, the lack of legislation on surrogacy has created a scenario of legal uncertainty and lack of protection for both surrogate mothers and children born through this method, increasing the risks of exploitation. This study aimed to examine the impact of this regulatory void on the right to motherhood and propose legal models based on successful international experiences. Using a qualitative approach and an interpretive paradigm, the research included a literature review and semi-structured interviews with nine legal professionals and sociologists, as well as two individuals who participated in surrogacy processes. The sampling was purposive, and data collection continued until the information obtained was consistently reiterated among participants, reaching saturation. The results revealed legal gaps that expose surrogate mothers to exploitation and complicate the formalization of agreements among the parties involved in the surrogacy process. Compared to international models, such as those in Canada and Greece, it was concluded that Ecuador needs to implement a legal framework that ensures informed consent, protects human rights, and guarantees equity in surrogacy agreements.

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.noStats##

References

Arvidsson, A., Johnsdotter, S., Emmelin, M., & Essén, B. (2019). Being questioned as parents: An interview study with Swedish commissioning parents using transnational surrogacy. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online, 8(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.08.001

Bandelli, D. (2021). Sociological debates on gestational surrogacy: Between legitimation and international abolition. Department of Human Studies, LUMSA University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80302-5

Blazier, J., & Janssens, R. (2020). Regulating the international surrogacy market: The ethics of commercial surrogacy in the Netherlands and India. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 23(2), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09935-5

Boell, S., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews. Formulating research methods for information systems, 45(1), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

Bromfield, N., & Rotabi, K. (2014). Global surrogacy, exploitation, human rights and international private law: A pragmatic stance and policy recommendations. Glob Soc Welf, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-014-0019-4

Carone, N., Baiocco, R., & Lingiardi, V. (2016). Italian gay fathers’ experiences of transnational surrogacy and their relationship with the surrogate pre- and post-birth. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 33(2), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.001

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.

González, N. (2020). Legal and ethical issues in cross-border gestational surrogacy. Fertility and Sterility, 113(5), 916-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.021

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

Horsey, K. (2024). The future of surrogacy: a review of current global trends and national landscapes. RBMO, 48(5), 103764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103764

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists: Between Ethical Conduct and Regulatory Compliance. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209779

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE Publications.

Lozanski, K. (2015). Transnational surrogacy: Canada's contradictions. Social Science & Medicine, 124, 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.003

Majumdar, A. (2017). Transnational commercial surrogacy and the (un)making of kin in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Markens, S. (2012). The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy. Social Science & Medicine, 74(10), 1560-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.013

Martínez, J., & Munuera, P. (2024). Surrogacy in the United States: An analysis of surrogates’ sociodemographic profiles and motivations. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 52 (1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104302

Meinke, S. (1988). Surrogate Motherhood: Ethical and Legal Issues. Bioethics Research Library.

Mucklejohn, I., & Hahle, J. (2019). Single fathers by choice: Memoirs of getting twins and triplets via transnational gestational surrogacy. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online, 9(2), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.rbms.2019.08.001

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 1-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824

Pande, A. (2014). Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rathore, V., Choudhary, A., Jakhar, H., Balani, D., Sharma, D., & Pal, S. (2024). Exploring surrogacy: Ethical, legal, and social implications. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(5), 2855-2857. Disponible en: https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V5ISSUE5/IJRPR27473.pdf

Saravanan, S. (2018). A transnational feminist view of surrogacy biomarkets in India. En Surrogacy, Law and Human Rights (pp. 150-158). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6869-0

Saxena, P., Mishra, A., & Malik, S. (2012). Surrogacy: Ethical and legal issues. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 37(4), 211-213. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.103466

Soumya, K., & Priyanka, T. (2023). The surrogacy (regulation) Act, 2021: A critique. Asian Bioethics Review, 15, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-022-00222-5

Stuvøy, I. (2018). Troublesome reproduction: surrogacy under scrutiny. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online, 7, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.015

Tanderup, M., Pande, A., Schmidt, L., Nielsen, B., Humaidan, P., & Kroløkke, C. (2023). Impact of the war in Ukraine and the COVID - 19 pandemic on transnational surrogacy - a qualitative study of Danish infertile couples'experiences of being in 'exile'. RBMO, 47(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.06.013

Published

2025-04-04
##submissions.stats##
522

How to Cite

Right to motherhood in surrogacy processes and the lack in the ecuadorian legal system. (2025). Journal of Science and Research: Revista Ciencia E Investigación, 10(2), 1-23. https://revistas.utb.edu.ec/index.php/sr/article/view/3398

Issue

Section

Artículo de Investigación