Reflection, Metacognition, and Self-Assessment as Strategies to Improve the Academic Performance and Transform Beliefs in English Language Learners
Palabras clave:
Reflection, metacognition, self-assessment, academic performance, beliefsResumen
In contexts of the technological era, Education 4.0 has been shaped into active, reflective, and authentic models. Learners are now required to master skills and competences that not only help them adapt and thrive in more demanding academic contexts, but also prepare them for professional and personal ones. In the same vein, Reflective learning, integrated with metacognitive strategies and self-assessment constructs have been studied even more since its effectiveness and success in the educational setting. This article has addressed two research questions: a) To what extent do Metacognition and Self-assessment influence the improvement of students’ English performance? and b) To what extent does Reflective learning transforms students’ prior beliefs and conceptions about English learning, as well as the role that the students themselves play in this process? For this purpose, a mixed-method design was applied, with qualitative and quantitative instruments such as pre and posttests based on rubrics, and pre-post surveys. Findings have evidenced a statistically significant improvement in students’ language performance (MD=-2.14), and how the incorporation of those strategies has presented a potential effect on these improvements (Cohen’s D=1.67; p<0.001, highly significant). In addition, learners’ beliefs and conceptions toward learning have been transformed positively into a more active and student-centered model orientation. Therefore, studies with control groups on the same topic are recommended to be considered to contribute to this field of study with more in-depth investigations. Finally, this study has implications for a higher-level education context, with a focus on its effects on teaching English.
Descargas
Citas
Alger, C. (2006). ‘What went well, what didn’t go so well’: Growth of reflection in pre-service teachers. Reflective Practice, 7(3), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940600837327
Almache, G., & Ramírez, R. (2019). Classifying vocabulary to improve reading comprehension in EFL learning: an action research study. [Clasificación de vocabulario para mejorar la comprensión lectora en el aprendizaje de inglés como idioma extrajera: un estudio de investigación para la acción]. AtoZ: Novas Práticas em Informação e ConhecimentoAtoZ: Novas Prácticas em Informacao e Conhecimiento, 9(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v9i2.73526
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544
Bailie, A. L., Gebre, E., & Chinnery, A. (2025). Reflective learning in education courses: Conceptualizations and instructional strategies. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of teaching and learning, 16 (1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1488978.pdf
Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self- assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), 22-30. https:// doi.org/10.14786/flr. v2i1.24
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D. C. Heath.
Derrick, B., Toher, D., & White, P. (2017). How to compare the means of two samples that include paired observations and independent observations. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 13(2), 120-126. doi:10.20982/tqmp.13.2.p120
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 40, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.9066
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., y Hall, C. (2016). NMC Informe Horizon 2016 Edición Superior de Educación. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Marantika, J. E. R. (2021). Metacognitive ability and autonomous learning strategy in improving learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.17392
Martin, M. (2005). Reflection in teacher education: How can it be supported? Educational Action Research, 13(4), 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790500200303
Panadero, E., Brown, G., & Courtney, M. (2014). Teachers’ reasons for using self-assessment: a survey self-report of Spanish teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.919247
Roberts, P. (2016). Reflection: A renewed and practical focus for an existing problem in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n7.2
Sahoo, P. R. (2022). Reimagining the Role of Science Education in Development of 21st Century Learning Skills with Reference to NEP 2020 Reimagining the Role of Science Education in Development of 21 st Century Learning Skills with Reference to NEP 2020. 12(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.30954/2230-7311.2.2021.14
Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice, 19, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_1
Stefani, L., Clarke, J., & Littlejohn, A. (2000). Developing a student-centred approach to reflective learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000050034529
Van, S., & Habok, A (2023). Metacognition in Language Learning among Non-English-major Tertiary Students. MEXTENSOL Journal, 47 (3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1408136.pdf
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Marta Cecilia Álvarez Peña , Yanina del Rocio Carbo Silva , María José Sandoval Pérez , Vicente Javier Coello Vasquez

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La revista Magazine de las Ciencias permite que se mantengan los derechos de autoría sobre los artículos sin restricciones, así como los derechos de publicación sin restricciones.